We have been receiving a few well-meaning warnings about
the release of the movie The Impossible.
In case you don’t know, it tells the story of a Spanish family who were
holidaying in Thailand when the Boxing Day 2004 tsunami struck. They all
survived, miraculously. The Spanish director, Bayona, enlisted two extremely famous actors to play the
roles of the parents, María and Quique.
The other day I came across a lengthy
newspaper article titled ‘Unidas por el tsunami’ (United by the tsunami),
and signed by a Toni García. I was curious, so I read it. I can’t help but see it
as part of the huge ongoing promotional campaign for the movie; I just cannot consider
it any other way.
But for me, the only thing of value in the whole article is
María’s words. She chose to sell her story, and that's fine. I suppose she did so because it's a story
that ends ‘well’, so to speak. Had she lost any of her three children, I'm certain the
movie would have never seen the light of day.
María says she now knows herself strong, “because I know I'm fragile”. I do know what she’s talking about.
She knows her/their survival was a miracle, but says that
any religious connotations attached to the word need to be removed, dispelled. In other
words, it was impossible for her/them to survive, but somehow, inexplicably, she/they
did. I also know what she means, and I completely agree with her. I feel exactly the
same way about what my two sons, my wife and myself went through on 29 September 2009.
She acknowledges that she did make an attempt to read a book
about the survivors who lost loved ones that fateful day, but she was unable
to. I read Pacific
Tsunami: Galu Afi, but I doubt I'll ever read it again. María thinks that
the proverb “Time heals everything” is just a big lie. And I agree with her.
“Time does not heal anything, time is life […] . […] from afar everything
becomes more bearable, everything has become more anaesthetised. The rest are
clichés”, she tells the reporter.
The journalist, Toni García, writes the following: “[María]
rescued one of her sons from the water, despite being badly injured.” Hey, welcome
to the real world, Toni García! Any worthy parent, let me tell you, would try
to save their child in such circumstances.
Asked whether it is good to talk [about the tsunami], María
replied: “It depends on who you talk to. There are very few people who will sit
with you and talk about the subject openly. Me, I ask a lot of questions, and
if someone’s had an accident I will ask them, patiently. However, at least in my
case, people think it is taboo to talk about it, about the wave, the tsunami.
When I returned [to Spain], people would look at me with fear, as if saying,
‘Take it easy, I'm not going to ask you anything’.” I know all too well what
María is talking about.
I read elsewhere a stupidly cruel review of The Impossible. It more or less said it
was a very melodramatic film about a family of tourists who had lost their entire
luggage in the Boxing Day tsunami. The point the reviewer wanted to make was
that hundreds of thousands of people died, that so many thousands of families lost
loved ones, children, siblings, parents, grandparents… so why make a movie
about a Western family whose five members survived? Other reviewers have drawn
attention to the fact that the movie basically ignores the Thai victims by
focusing only on a Western family. I will offer no opinion on that, because I
have not seen the movie.
But I have watched the trailer of The Impossible. Online. All I can say is, the tsunami scenes are
incredibly realistic. It is very much like that. But I also want to emphasise the 'incredible' aspect of it. Don’t forget it's a movie. Reality is a f**king lot
worse.
Luckily for the director, María had a lot of input in the script. I guess
we should not be surprised if it were awarded an Oscar for the FX.
But what I really wanted to consider was this: I wonder what
we would say to each other, if one day I met María. I have seen her photograph:
I have noticed how her eyes look somehow lost, like they're glancing at something that
is not there. That look is vaguely familiar.
She still has all her three children.
I have only two left.
On the morning of Boxing Day 2004 we were on a beautiful beach
in New South Wales, thousands of kilometres away from the death and destruction
that was taking place in the Indian Ocean. Clea was almost two years old; she
was running on the white sand, running away from the waves that came too close, and she was giggling, giggling, like she always used to do.
I will not watch the movie. But it's nothing to do with the tsunami images, it's nothing to do with fear. The truth is I don't need a movie to remind me.
I guess I just don’t enjoy happy endings that much these days.
I guess I just don’t enjoy happy endings that much these days.
I saw a trailer of the movie and all I could think about was Clea and all of your family and the permanent devastation. Since reading your blog, a tsunami seems very personal to me, not an abstract event that happens to other people.
ReplyDeleteI don't know if I'll watch the movie or not, but I know what you mean about not enjoying happy endings these days. Believing in happy endings was part of my old life. I know now that nothing is certain, there are no guarantees and that change will happen, whether I want it or not.
Thank you very much for commenting this post. I think it certainly takes some degree of bravery to express your reaction to the trailer in the context of my post. So thank you for that.
DeleteWhile it is not my intention to dissuade people from watching the movie (I'm not in the business of telling anyone what to watch or not), I'm sure you'll agree that the trailer images are so realistic that they can be quite confronting. It is just a movie, of course. But not for me, it is not just a movie.